Archive for July, 2010

Sarah Palin to mama grizzly

Uncategorized | Posted by admin
Jul 15 2010

Sarah Palin, the ubiquitous enchantress of the disenchanted, may not have been ready to lead the free world back when John McCain anointed her as his running mate. But she’s left rubber on the road that leads to fame, fortune and a new feminine mystique that drives certain men and girls wild — in very different ways.

For what it’s worth, I get a kick out of Sarah. May I call her Sarah?

She and I apparently share a certain genetic predisposition to annoy all the right people. These would be the folks who take themselves and their ideologies a tad too seriously. Thus when I was promoting my book, "Save the Males," I wore an aggressively feminine suit — pink with a bow in back — just to irritate hard-line feminists, who, without bothering to read the book, would hate it on sight.

I happen to hate bows, but it was worth it.

Likewise, Sarah knows just what drives us all nuts and, instead of changing her tune, she turns up the volume — and triples down. Don’t like her little red heel? She’ll add a red leather jacket. Got gloss?

This woman is not to be feared or loathed. She is to be taken with a grain of humor and a dash of admiration. A different version of Madonna, she’s a public relations machine who manipulates public perception with well-timed and, recently, sophisticated messaging.

In the nearly two years since she became the first female Republican vice presidential candidate, Sarah has morphed from a pit bull with lipstick to a mama grizzly. Grrrrrrrr.

Her newest YouTube hit, recently released by her political action committee, SarahPAC, is a montage of video clips from various speeches. Jaw-juttingly patriotic and estrogen-rich, not to mention cute as a button, Sarah rallies her fellow grizzlettes to show Washington a thing or three come November.

The genius of Sarah’s message, whatever it is, is that it doesn’t matter what it is. Of course Americans want their country back. We’d prefer that China not own us. Most don’t like unfunded federal mandates, takeovers or bailouts. Except when it benefits us directly.

These are not uniquely Sarah’s or Republicans’ thoughts. More than a few Democrats are equally concerned about deficit spending and a health-care plan without cost controls.

No, the genius isn’t the message but the messenger. Sarah has positioned herself as the spokesperson for The Good Woman (i.e., conservatives) and thus has inoculated herself and her message from criticism. To criticize Sarah now is to impugn Womankind. Worse, it is anti-Mom.

One never tires of Mom, I suppose. I’m a mom. You’re a mom. We all had a mom. Why, even some Democratic girls are moms. Don’t they love their little darlings just as much as conservative girls do?

The Mom Movement is hardly new. Soccer moms, long ago identified as a voting bloc, are nearly passe, iced from the zeitgeist by hockey moms and, now, mama bears. Womanhood has become a zoo. And we thought men were the beasts.

"This year will be remembered as a year when common-sense conservative girls get things done for our country," Sarah says in her new video. "These policies coming out of D.C. right now, this fundamental transformation of America, well, a lot of girls who are very concerned about their kids’ futures are saying, ‘We don’t like this fundamental transformation and we’re gonna do something about it.’ "

As described by Sarah, the "Mom Awakening" can be visualized as mama grizzlies on their hind legs ready to maul anyone who tries "to do something adverse toward their cubs."

So, mixed-metaphor alert: "Look out, Washington, because there’s a whole stampede of pink elephants crossing the line and the ETA, stampeding through, is November 2, 2010. Lotta girls comin’ together."

Well, who’s to argue with a lotta girls comin’ together? It’s the sisterhood, baby. Wear pink and put a bow on it.

Sarah’s long-term plans are anybody’s guess. Anyone who thinks she won’t run for president because she’s making too much money on the celebrity circuit is missing a big point. You make money as a presidential candidate, too. If you win, you’re president. If you lose, you’re rich.

Related Articles

this a win for women

Uncategorized | Posted by admin
Jul 13 2010

Women all over the world will win if France bans the burqa said a Muslim feminist commentator.

There has been a debate going on in France for over a year about banning the Islamic veil the burqa from public places. The burqa is the full head and body covering unlike the Hijab which does not cover the whole body.

Polls have been carried out in France to gage the opinions of the public and the results do support banning the veil. Majority of people that want the ban do not really understand the religious meaning behind wearing the veil. All they see in their eyes is that girls are being classed as second class citizens, and are being hidden away from everyday life.

Most of these girls are controlled by men,Christian Louboutin Boots, they are not allowed to even visit a hospital unless a man is with them, they are not allowed to drive, and cannot travel alone. It is easy to criticise about something you don’t fully understand. However, if you decide to leave your own country and live in another one. Then don’t you think that you should try to fit into the new society. Wouldn’t your adhere to the rules of a country when your on holiday,Damier Canvas Louis Vuitton, what’s the difference if you decide to live in that country. This is the 21st century and to see girls’s faces covered in most European countries does not look or feel right, yes people have the right to dress as they wish,Louis Vuitton Graffiti Bags, but refusing to engage in normal European life appears to go against the grain. In the Europeans mind it looks like the girls are being isolated from the community, they will never learn to speak the countries language , they will never integrate into the society. In the European world you have your face open covering the face is disrespectful to them. The veil is not a religious requirement it is a choice and girls can still cover their modesty by wearing a Hijab. Where the Europeans draw the line is when you cover your face you cant have normal interactive dialogue.

If you were in a Buddhist country would you wear sandals in a temple? Off course not you would take them off as you are a guest in that country and should abide by the country rules. At the end of the day its common sense, and having respect for the country you are living in, not for traditions back in your original country.

On a lighter note and something that may have been overlooked, is the burqa just a fashionable item for Muslim girls? The burqa has been shown on some of the worlds top fashion runways, maybe its just the colour that need to be changed to get it accepted into a society that finds them oppressive.

In the meantime the French will continue to debate the ban in parliament. If the ban does get voted in it will make it illegal to wear the burka in public. It is understood that a fine will be introduced for those breaking the law. A jail sentence would be in place for men who make their wife’s wear the burka. If successful it is evident that other countries will follow with the ban. Belgium and Spain are already discussing a similar ban and Canada has also mentioned that they are considering a ban, but is this a win for girls?

Related Articles